BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BIMMERPOST Universal Forums General BMW News and Cars Discussion BMW says self-driving car to be level 5 capable by 2021

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-18-2017, 07:54 PM   #67
Agni
First Lieutenant
Agni's Avatar
United_States
116
Rep
372
Posts

Drives: F36 435i M Gran Coupe
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chicago

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 335xi  [0.00]
2006 325i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by STK View Post
Further, the number of brands and variety will plummet. Who really cares about what car picks them up? There will be compact, mid-size, and luxury with the option to ride alone or pick someone up along the way. It will be like getting pick up at the airport in a Town Car or a Prius.

There will probably be an intermediate period were individuals will own a car with manual or autonomous option. But once autonomous cars reach a critical mass, manual mode driving will be against the law as too dangerous. About 30,000 people a year die in auto accidents now. That will end. The folks on this tread we'll take an autonomous car to the track where our manual cars will be in storage ready to go. And that's where it's the most fun to drive anyway. But i think it will take considerably longer than 5 years.

btw -the 3,000,000 people that drive for a living will lose their jobs.

Interesting times indeed.
So what if those jobs are gone? New jobs will be created. Start learning programming, especially machine learning. Instead of people wasting time driving, they will be doing more productive things.
Appreciate 0
      03-18-2017, 08:07 PM   #68
MalibuBimmer
Founder, Knights of the Roundel website
MalibuBimmer's Avatar
United_States
967
Rep
1,723
Posts

Drives: 2015 M4 and 2018 AMG GT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Santa Monica Mountains, CA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2018 Mercedes AMG GT  [0.00]
2018 Audi Q3  [0.00]
2015 BMW M4  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyr4 View Post
I think most people here are missing the bigger picture. Currently the average car is only used 3% of the time, as it sits parked for the other 97%. That is a huge waste of an asset. Eventually BMW and others will offer some type of service where you can use their fleet to pick you up, drop you off, and then it will move on to the next person so that each car is used 90% of the time instead of 3%! Only enthusiasts and the wealthy will own cars, as most will consider them a waste of money and won't want to drive. Most people won't own cars in the future and a LOT less will be produced due to the 90% utilization. Big changes ahead...
I've seen that movie. It's called New York City.
__________________
Previously: 2014 i8; 2013 650i convertible; 2013 650i Gran Coupe; 2013 X1; 2010 550i GT; 2010 535 GT; 2010 Z4 3.5; 2008 535ixt; 2007 M6 convertible; 2006 650i convertible; 1996 Z3; 1980 633CSi; 1978 630CS; 1972 3.0CS; 1971 Bavaria. (1971; 1979-2005 & 2017 - ? -- the Mercedes years.)
Appreciate 1
      03-18-2017, 09:42 PM   #69
filet.M2c
Captain
filet.M2c's Avatar
783
Rep
763
Posts

Drives: M2c / mach e
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Arizona

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Agni View Post
So what if those jobs are gone? New jobs will be created. Start learning programming, especially machine learning. Instead of people wasting time driving, they will be doing more productive things.
Of course, go to school for CS or engineering. But the 3,000,000 drivers will be replaced with 30,000 engineers. I agree autonomous is the future. Ownership as we know it will change. Instead of many people owning a car, they will opt to pay a company like uber or BMW a monthly $200 subscription for have access to their fleet. Car picks you up and drops you off whenever you need it. I don't know how smooth the transition would be though... I mean if people are as passionate as they are about guns, then driving will be a shit storm.
Appreciate 1
STK215.50
      03-18-2017, 11:14 PM   #70
W///
Lieutenant General
W///'s Avatar
7436
Rep
12,293
Posts

Drives: F82GTS, E36/E92M3, Z4M
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SC

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnegan View Post
Fast food was the future too. Easier. Faster. Cheaper. That doesn't mean it's "better".

Is it possible this tech can improve things? Sure. But I reject the idea that it's automatically better because it's new. Or that we should jump on the sales/marketing bandwagon because it's new. New isn't the only destination. Leonardo DaVinci's works aren't new. Nor are Picasso's. Nor is the Jaguar E-Type. But that doesn't mean they are obsolete, irrelevant, or "worse" than new things.

New can be better. New can be worse. The assumption new is always better is consumerism, marketing, and sales 101. Not a promise or guarantee of "better".
Why can you not have a fun car like our Z4M that can self drive. Don't get me wrong, I probably wouldn't want to actually own one of those, but I'd def consider leasing one as long as it's an option.

Let's be honest, the day when it's illegal to drive on public roads is decades away. I'm not worried about something that far off yet
Appreciate 0
      03-19-2017, 01:51 AM   #71
mikefromMA
First Lieutenant
United_States
36
Rep
344
Posts

Drives: 2017 m4
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MA

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2017 BMW m4  [0.00]
2015 428  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yeineken View Post
As someone who has a two hour commute, I welcome this technology.

It'll make the roads safer and allow people to multitask without killing a small family and ruining people's lives.
as someone who welcomes change because I simply don't know any better and believe in the evolution of technology, I too welcome it
Appreciate 0
      03-19-2017, 03:42 AM   #72
Finnegan
Dog Listener
Finnegan's Avatar
United_States
701
Rep
7,850
Posts

Drives: Z4M/. Z3M, E36/46 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Teaching the dog to slalom

iTrader: (22)

Quote:
Originally Posted by W/// View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnegan View Post
Fast food was the future too. Easier. Faster. Cheaper. That doesn't mean it's "better".

Is it possible this tech can improve things? Sure. But I reject the idea that it's automatically better because it's new. Or that we should jump on the sales/marketing bandwagon because it's new. New isn't the only destination. Leonardo DaVinci's works aren't new. Nor are Picasso's. Nor is the Jaguar E-Type. But that doesn't mean they are obsolete, irrelevant, or "worse" than new things.

New can be better. New can be worse. The assumption new is always better is consumerism, marketing, and sales 101. Not a promise or guarantee of "better".
Why can you not have a fun car like our Z4M that can self drive. Don't get me wrong, I probably wouldn't want to actually own one of those, but I'd def consider leasing one as long as it's an option.

Let's be honest, the day when it's illegal to drive on public roads is decades away. I'm not worried about something that far off yet
It's pretty simple: because the fun is in the doing, the actual driving, the engagement and skills required. The Z4M is a fun car but only because you can operate it--it's not fun by simply existing or if it drove me around. What makes it fun is the demands it makes to drive it well and the rewards from doing so.

How many of us who truly enjoy the act of driving like being passengers? Playing golf or watching golf? Watching poker or playing poker? Drinking a fine wine or watching others imbibe? Being at the Grand Canyon vs. watching it from an armchair? Cleaning and jerking 250 lbs or watching a robot do it?

It may be some time off but the never ending banging of the drum to accept passivity, or merely acquiesce to the idea that new is always better, or that any activity must be 100% devoid of risk from those who would profit by such notions greatly disturbing. Remove the profit component and it's still disturbing. Humans exist, improve, achieve, experience by doing, "be" and "are" not by being inert lumps of passivity and inaction, but by participating and acting. Requiring absolute safety and absolute levels of mandated risk avoidance is in itself a major risk from my point of view. It's an assault on freedom. Falls are the second leading cause of death. Maybe we should make self-moving chairs a mandate. (Silly but it's the logical extension of the "eliminate all risk make safe" argument.)

Is that rather philosophical? Sure. But I see an existential threat to that which defines humanity in the overarching incessant drive to make us passive/inert. I prefer activity in all areas of life to sitting in an armchair. Even if that means some level of risk. Life, being actually alive, entails risk not some false bargain of absolute or close to absolute safety.

The future is that which we create. I prefer a future where we are actors in the play rather than being relegated to only being permitted to be members of the audience.
Appreciate 3
Efthreeoh16950.50
drexplode1763.50
      03-19-2017, 08:11 AM   #73
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16951
Rep
18,580
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by drexplode View Post
As long as I have the option to turn it on and off then I'm ok with semi/fully autonomous functionality; however, I do not want a transportation vessel to which I have no direct control.
That is how it will end up being, a transportation vessel with no direct control. It has to be this way. The DOT will not let a mix of autonomous and driver-driven cars on the same road.

I think people drastically underestimate how complex converting to autonomous driving will be in regards to the technology, government oversight, personal property rights, and privacy rights.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
Appreciate 0
      03-19-2017, 08:15 AM   #74
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16951
Rep
18,580
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnegan View Post
It's pretty simple: because the fun is in the doing, the actual driving, the engagement and skills required. The Z4M is a fun car but only because you can operate it--it's not fun by simply existing or if it drove me around. What makes it fun is the demands it makes to drive it well and the rewards from doing so.

How many of us who truly enjoy the act of driving like being passengers? Playing golf or watching golf? Watching poker or playing poker? Drinking a fine wine or watching others imbibe? Being at the Grand Canyon vs. watching it from an armchair? Cleaning and jerking 250 lbs or watching a robot do it?

It may be some time off but the never ending banging of the drum to accept passivity, or merely acquiesce to the idea that new is always better, or that any activity must be 100% devoid of risk from those who would profit by such notions greatly disturbing. Remove the profit component and it's still disturbing. Humans exist, improve, achieve, experience by doing, "be" and "are" not by being inert lumps of passivity and inaction, but by participating and acting. Requiring absolute safety and absolute levels of mandated risk avoidance is in itself a major risk from my point of view. It's an assault on freedom. Falls are the second leading cause of death. Maybe we should make self-moving chairs a mandate. (Silly but it's the logical extension of the "eliminate all risk make safe" argument.)

Is that rather philosophical? Sure. But I see an existential threat to that which defines humanity in the overarching incessant drive to make us passive/inert. I prefer activity in all areas of life to sitting in an armchair. Even if that means some level of risk. Life, being actually alive, entails risk not some false bargain of absolute or close to absolute safety.

The future is that which we create. I prefer a future where we are actors in the play rather than being relegated to only being permitted to be members of the audience.
This is exactly perfect. Eloquent. Thank you, sir.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
Appreciate 2
Finnegan701.00
drexplode1763.50
      03-19-2017, 08:16 AM   #75
STK
Private First Class
216
Rep
190
Posts

Drives: '18 M2 6MT
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post
Humans will not be allowed?? Whom is going to take this freedom away; Aliens? :
I'm afraid it's going to be the same people that replaced workers with robots and moved millions of manufacturing jobs overseas. If companies can save money by replacing drivers in commercial vehicles, and if other companies can make money helping them do it, then that is our future. And they'll have a pretty good argument: fewer deaths, less pollution, and less congestion.

I, of course, would prefer jet packs and flying cars. I just don't see that coming. Too bad.
Appreciate 0
      03-19-2017, 08:30 AM   #76
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16951
Rep
18,580
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyr4 View Post
I think most people here are missing the bigger picture. Currently the average car is only used 3% of the time, as it sits parked for the other 97%. That is a huge waste of an asset. Eventually BMW and others will offer some type of service where you can use their fleet to pick you up, drop you off, and then it will move on to the next person so that each car is used 90% of the time instead of 3%! Only enthusiasts and the wealthy will own cars, as most will consider them a waste of money and won't want to drive. Most people won't own cars in the future and a LOT less will be produced due to the 90% utilization. Big changes ahead...
I think this is a ridiculous argument; it can be made for practically anything you own. You use your bed for 33% of the day; your kitchen 12.5% of the day; your bathroom 8% of the day. Should we pay-by-use for all those as well? My tools, which have saved me tens of thousands of dollars over the 30 or so years I've owned them, get used maybe 6 hours a week, and that's not every tool I own.

Autonomous driving will turn personal transportation into a service, just like dining out; which will increase to unit cost to transport one's self, not decrease the cost. People dine out all the time, but still own and use their kitchens.
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
Appreciate 2
GuidoK10473.00
fbsm743.00
      03-19-2017, 09:03 AM   #77
STK
Private First Class
216
Rep
190
Posts

Drives: '18 M2 6MT
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Efthreeoh View Post
I think this is a ridiculous argument; it can be made for practically anything you own. You use your bed for 33% of the day; your kitchen 12.5% of the day; your bathroom 8% of the day. Should we pay-by-use for all those as well? My tools, which have saved me tens of thousands of dollars over the 30 or so years I've owned them, get used maybe 6 hours a week, and that's not every tool I own.

Autonomous driving will turn personal transportation into a service, just like dining out; which will increase to unit cost to transport one's self, not decrease the cost. People dine out all the time, but still own and use their kitchens.
I think the point is autonomous cars will drive down the cost of the service, unlike dining out.

Most people would rather not drive. However, they don't have a chauffeur because it costs way too much. What if they could have a chauffeur for free? That, in essence, is an autonomous car that you own.

Now, what if you had a friend who never wants to drive when you do and vice versa. You could buy a car together and save a bunch and still cover depreciation. You could save a little less if you have cleaned between drives. So now you have a chauffeured car at much less than the cost of full ownership. That, in essence, is the autonomous BMW or Uber service. How many people are going to say no to that? The economics change a lot when you don't have to pay the driver and the costs of sharing plummet.

It's going to take a while. Take solace in that.
Appreciate 0
      03-19-2017, 09:26 AM   #78
Dog Face Pony Soldier
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
Dog Face Pony Soldier's Avatar
United_States
9720
Rep
6,445
Posts

Drives: M Sport 335i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 335i  [9.74]
States are already concerned about autonomous vehicles causing a massive increase in traffic congestion, pollution, and wear on the roads. I believe one state even passed legislation preventing autonomous vehicles from traveling without a passenger.

The thinking is that people could have their vehicle drive back home by itself (for whatever reason) after dropping off its passengers; then drive itself back while empty. Autonomous vehicle owners might forgo finding a parking spot and choose have their vehicle continuously circle the area while they briefly run into a destination. Further, people would be less inclined to use mass transit if they didn't need to manage their car in rush-hour traffic or park it at the destination.

It seems to me that autonomous vehicles driving without passengers has the potential to cause more problems than they attempt to solve. It will be interesting to see how this particular aspect of autonomous vehicles shakes out over the next decade.
__________________
Appreciate 1
drexplode1763.50
      03-19-2017, 09:51 AM   #79
Dog Face Pony Soldier
2006 TIME Person Of The Year
Dog Face Pony Soldier's Avatar
United_States
9720
Rep
6,445
Posts

Drives: M Sport 335i
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Jersey

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 335i  [9.74]
Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post
States are already concerned about autonomous vehicles causing a massive increase in traffic, congestion, pollution, and wear on the roads. I believe one state even passed legislation preventing autonomous vehicles from traveling without a passenger.

The thinking is that people could have their vehicle drive back home by itself (for whatever reason) after dropping off its passengers; then drive itself back while empty. Autonomous vehicle owners might forgo finding a parking spot and choose have their vehicle continuously circle the area while they briefly run into a destination. Further, people would be less inclined to use mass transit if they didn't need to manage their car in rush-hour traffic or park it at the destination.

It seems to me that autonomous vehicles driving without passengers has the potential to cause more problems than they attempt to solve. It will be interesting to see how this particular aspect of autonomous vehicles shakes out over the next decade.
Just found article speaking to the point I'm making in my post. Apparently the technical term for this challenge is "empty repositioning."

Quote:
Here we see a technology that massively disrupts not only traditional businesses, but also public policy on mass transit. Drivers don?t have to drive during their commute, and can send their vehicles home when they are not using them, avoiding the cost of parking. Transportation planners are wholly unprepared for this future, and given the hundreds of billions of dollars that have been spent on public transit systems that are inflexible and capital intensive hub-and-spoke systems, I forecast a lot of pain ahead.

http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2016/09/22/a...ing-challenge/
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-19-2017, 09:52 AM   #80
Efthreeoh
General
United_States
16951
Rep
18,580
Posts

Drives: The E90 + Z4 Coupe & Z3 R'ster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by STK View Post
I think the point is autonomous cars will drive down the cost of the service, unlike dining out.

Most people would rather not drive. However, they don't have a chauffeur because it costs way too much. What if they could have a chauffeur for free? That, in essence, is an autonomous car that you own.

Now, what if you had a friend who never wants to drive when you do and vice versa. You could buy a car together and save a bunch and still cover depreciation. You could save a little less if you have cleaned between drives. So now you have a chauffeured car at much less than the cost of full ownership. That, in essence, is the autonomous BMW or Uber service. How many people are going to say no to that? The economics change a lot when you don't have to pay the driver and the costs of sharing plummet.

It's going to take a while. Take solace in that.
I think most young people don't want to drive, and that's because the are connected to other young people via a different technology, not a replacement technology. I think Finnegan's point is that how many young people would just let their phone communicate for them. Give the phone the topic of discussion and your point of view, then let the software do the rest...
__________________
A manual transmission can be set to "comfort", "sport", and "track" modes simply by the technique and speed at which you shift it; it doesn't need "modes", modes are for manumatics that try to behave like a real 3-pedal manual transmission. If you can money-shift it, it's a manual transmission. "Yeah, but NO ONE puts an automatic trans shift knob on a manual transmission."
Appreciate 1
Finnegan701.00
      03-19-2017, 11:03 AM   #81
Finnegan
Dog Listener
Finnegan's Avatar
United_States
701
Rep
7,850
Posts

Drives: Z4M/. Z3M, E36/46 M3
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Teaching the dog to slalom

iTrader: (22)

Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinlevrone View Post
It's clear to me that humans will not be allowed to drive on public roads for much longer. 20-25 years from now I can forsee the end of human driving (except on racetracks).
Humans will not be allowed?? Whom is going to take this freedom away; Aliens? :
Two ways Glenn: legally via requiring some level of autonomous "protection and safety"; via unaffordable insurance rates.

If you'd like to know more see "microstamping" and "magazine limits/bans" in California. Or see liability/insurance laws being proposed for guns in New York, Washington state, etc. See reproductive rights limitations ("facility licensing", etc.) in Texas.

Both the left and right employ the same methods/tools to restrict, limit, eliminate. The argument always has to do ostensibly with "safety" or limiting/eliminating the perceived evil/risk. Either of these above provide a good model for how this would roll out. Politicians aren't that creative, it is plausible they'll rely on exiting methods.
Appreciate 1
      03-19-2017, 11:22 PM   #82
M2Crew
First Lieutenant
219
Rep
350
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: United States

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by glennQNYC View Post
States are already concerned about autonomous vehicles causing a massive increase in traffic congestion, pollution, and wear on the roads. I believe one state even passed legislation preventing autonomous vehicles from traveling without a passenger.

The thinking is that people could have their vehicle drive back home by itself (for whatever reason) after dropping off its passengers; then drive itself back while empty. Autonomous vehicle owners might forgo finding a parking spot and choose have their vehicle continuously circle the area while they briefly run into a destination. Further, people would be less inclined to use mass transit if they didn't need to manage their car in rush-hour traffic or park it at the destination.

It seems to me that autonomous vehicles driving without passengers has the potential to cause more problems than they attempt to solve. It will be interesting to see how this particular aspect of autonomous vehicles shakes out over the next decade.
Why would anyone send the car home versus simply letting it park itself in the spot that you would've needed anyway?

Autonomous driving delivers massive value in the form of incredible convenience and reclaimed time. Uber is the version 0.1a of this; people are ready at scale for a product or service that allows them to be driven on their own schedule.

Go try Tesla's implementation in traffic. Why anyone would want to go back to handling boring commutes or stop-and-go or long, monotonous drives themselves is completely beyond me.
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2017, 12:26 AM   #83
guarnibl
Major
210
Rep
1,048
Posts

Drives: Depends on the day.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speed-NYC View Post
Autominous is just an option for when driving is otherwise tedious. You will still want it to be a great car like a bimmer for the times you are in old timey manual mode. What will be interesting to see is if our kids choose never to drive using manual controls.
Driving will gradually become illegal/require a special license within time. Not sure how long but that's where it's going.

Edit : already been said. I really don't want it to happen though. Hopefully I'm batshit insane / senile by then and won't give a damn.
__________________
2019 Jeep Wrangler | 2018 BMW 320i | 2016 Porsche Boxster Spyder | 2009 Jeep Wrangler
gone: 2015 M4, 2015 335i, 2012 Turbo S, 2008 M3, 2004 M3, 2003 330xi
Appreciate 1
Finnegan701.00
      03-20-2017, 07:44 AM   #84
3s-a-charm
Major
3s-a-charm's Avatar
Canada
135
Rep
1,328
Posts

Drives: 2017 Tesla Model X
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary, Canada

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2007 BMW X5  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnegan View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by W/// View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnegan View Post
Fast food was the future too. Easier. Faster. Cheaper. That doesn't mean it's "better".

Is it possible this tech can improve things? Sure. But I reject the idea that it's automatically better because it's new. Or that we should jump on the sales/marketing bandwagon because it's new. New isn't the only destination. Leonardo DaVinci's works aren't new. Nor are Picasso's. Nor is the Jaguar E-Type. But that doesn't mean they are obsolete, irrelevant, or "worse" than new things.

New can be better. New can be worse. The assumption new is always better is consumerism, marketing, and sales 101. Not a promise or guarantee of "better".
Why can you not have a fun car like our Z4M that can self drive. Don't get me wrong, I probably wouldn't want to actually own one of those, but I'd def consider leasing one as long as it's an option.

Let's be honest, the day when it's illegal to drive on public roads is decades away. I'm not worried about something that far off yet
It's pretty simple: because the fun is in the doing, the actual driving, the engagement and skills required. The Z4M is a fun car but only because you can operate it--it's not fun by simply existing or if it drove me around. What makes it fun is the demands it makes to drive it well and the rewards from doing so.

How many of us who truly enjoy the act of driving like being passengers? Playing golf or watching golf? Watching poker or playing poker? Drinking a fine wine or watching others imbibe? Being at the Grand Canyon vs. watching it from an armchair? Cleaning and jerking 250 lbs or watching a robot do it?

It may be some time off but the never ending banging of the drum to accept passivity, or merely acquiesce to the idea that new is always better, or that any activity must be 100% devoid of risk from those who would profit by such notions greatly disturbing. Remove the profit component and it's still disturbing. Humans exist, improve, achieve, experience by doing, "be" and "are" not by being inert lumps of passivity and inaction, but by participating and acting. Requiring absolute safety and absolute levels of mandated risk avoidance is in itself a major risk from my point of view. It's an assault on freedom. Falls are the second leading cause of death. Maybe we should make self-moving chairs a mandate. (Silly but it's the logical extension of the "eliminate all risk make safe" argument.)

Is that rather philosophical? Sure. But I see an existential threat to that which defines humanity in the overarching incessant drive to make us passive/inert. I prefer activity in all areas of life to sitting in an armchair. Even if that means some level of risk. Life, being actually alive, entails risk not some false bargain of absolute or close to absolute safety.

The future is that which we create. I prefer a future where we are actors in the play rather than being relegated to only being permitted to be members of the audience.
Roller coasters are fun... but I'm not in control of it.
__________________
17 Tesla Model X 90D (I've been converted!)
PAST: 14 Tesla Model S P85D, 16 X1, 13 X5 M-sport, 04 M3 Cab, 08 E92 M3, 08 535xiT, 07 X5 4.8i, 06 E90 325i, 87 E30 325i, 85 E30 318i
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2017, 08:29 AM   #85
W///
Lieutenant General
W///'s Avatar
7436
Rep
12,293
Posts

Drives: F82GTS, E36/E92M3, Z4M
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SC

iTrader: (13)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Finnegan View Post
It's pretty simple: because the fun is in the doing, the actual driving, the engagement and skills required. The Z4M is a fun car but only because you can operate it--it's not fun by simply existing or if it drove me around. What makes it fun is the demands it makes to drive it well and the rewards from doing so.

How many of us who truly enjoy the act of driving like being passengers? Playing golf or watching golf? Watching poker or playing poker? Drinking a fine wine or watching others imbibe? Being at the Grand Canyon vs. watching it from an armchair? Cleaning and jerking 250 lbs or watching a robot do it?

It may be some time off but the never ending banging of the drum to accept passivity, or merely acquiesce to the idea that new is always better, or that any activity must be 100% devoid of risk from those who would profit by such notions greatly disturbing. Remove the profit component and it's still disturbing. Humans exist, improve, achieve, experience by doing, "be" and "are" not by being inert lumps of passivity and inaction, but by participating and acting. Requiring absolute safety and absolute levels of mandated risk avoidance is in itself a major risk from my point of view. It's an assault on freedom. Falls are the second leading cause of death. Maybe we should make self-moving chairs a mandate. (Silly but it's the logical extension of the "eliminate all risk make safe" argument.)

Is that rather philosophical? Sure. But I see an existential threat to that which defines humanity in the overarching incessant drive to make us passive/inert. I prefer activity in all areas of life to sitting in an armchair. Even if that means some level of risk. Life, being actually alive, entails risk not some false bargain of absolute or close to absolute safety.

The future is that which we create. I prefer a future where we are actors in the play rather than being relegated to only being permitted to be members of the audience.
Heck, I've got an E36 M3, an E92 M3 and a Z4MR all fighting for my attention. I'll be the first to admit that these aren't just modes of transportation for me. It's a hobby, it's art, it's my passion (and also my source of frustration too haha). I'm as big of an enthusiast as any you'll find around here. We both have an Z4M's for the very same reason.

But how fun is it driving in bumper to bumper traffic? How fun is a Z4M when you are literally going in a straight line for 3 hrs when you're heading out of town? This is hardly my idea for the use of "The Ultimate Driving Machine". Therefore, I see no problems with it if it's able to be turned on and off. Off when I'm doing a fun Sunday drive, on when I'm 1.5 hrs away from home on a Sunday night after going to a concert and have to be at work in 7 hrs.

I don't think there's anything wrong with just watching a movie while sipping on a cold beer, rather than being chased by aliens in real life
__________________
Current:
16 F82 M4 GTS, Black Sapphire/Black, DCT
08 E92 M3, Sparkling Graphite/Bamboo Beige, 6MT
07 E85 Z4M Roadster, Alpine White/Red, 6MT
99 E36 M3, Techno Violet/Dove Grey, 6MT
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2017, 10:21 AM   #86
The Automotive Enthusiast
Retired BMW Genius
The Automotive Enthusiast's Avatar
United_States
2888
Rep
3,404
Posts

Drives: 2018 Audi S5 Coupe
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: DMV

iTrader: (1)

As a Cyber Security major, I'd be scared to death to ride in an autonomous vehicle. Have to step-up the game a little.
Appreciate 1
      03-20-2017, 05:48 PM   #87
Fraggy
Brigadier General
Fraggy's Avatar
United_States
193
Rep
3,469
Posts

Drives: 2016 M3
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (11)

Before my mom died, she would have welcomed this. She had last her license due to poor vision. This would have given her freedom.

I don't want it, but imagine not being worried about DUIs anymore, lol.
__________________
2016 Alpine White M3 (gone)
2019 Alfa Romeo Guilia (Totaled)
2020 Car-less 😁 (no more)
2020 M340
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2017, 07:46 PM   #88
antzcrashing
Brigadier General
antzcrashing's Avatar
United_States
1875
Rep
3,201
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW 440i GC
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eastern MA

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
For the low low price of 7 series
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST