View Single Post
      09-20-2019, 11:51 AM   #63
M5Rick
General
M5Rick's Avatar
58880
Rep
19,243
Posts

Drives: M5 F10 DCT Gunmetal
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Southern England

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by racerbruce View Post
....should be presented to the FIA hearing in Paris....the end result will be they will state VET re-entered the track in an unsafe manner....is this due to VET's poor judgement? not wanting to wait to re-enter the track safely? not being able to have line of sight due to the car's construction?....

Results don't lie....VET's behavior is in violation of the FIA F1 Sporting Regulations, to the extent he is on thin ice due to multiple poor judgement altercations....VET has lost his way and the FIA is simply agreeing with VET's choices, which have caused on-track havoc....life is full of choices, and VET continues to make choices that make him look like a bar fighter instead of an F1 pilot.
I'll tell you something, if VET had been in a car where the head stands proud from the top of the bodywork then for sure I would be berating Seb,but now this is FIA requirement to have HANS and bodywork side impact sponge nearly covering the helmet. In this instance Seb could not see until it was too late BECAUSE of the requirements of FIA themselves, thus the 3 penalty points should be rescinded because of this anomaly.
Appreciate 0