View Single Post
      09-12-2009, 01:42 AM   #11
94JZA80
Captain
United_States
25
Rep
645
Posts

Drives: 1994 BPU Supra
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sarasota, FL

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citizen Z View Post
Amazing work. The only downside to that fabrication approach is there isn't any real flow/design analysis. Every thing is done with off the shelf billet/cnc machine parts/stock elbow sections etc. Its pretty much a "make it fit" approach which can produce really inefficient designs, despite the best efforts of a highly experienced craftsman. That said, if you're up against the wall reagards to space, do whatever it takes; that thing'll be a monster no matter how you slice it.
agreed - that is an unfortunate downside to the space limitations under the hood of the M Coupe. actually, most turbo M Coupes are bottom mount turbos, which allow for a manifold that is better in deisng with respect to flow rates and characteristics. but Brian wanted to be one of the rare M Coupes with a top mount turbo setup. luckily, given his power goals (~500whp on 93 octane and 600+whp on 100 octane & meth), the efficiency, or lack thereof, of the exhaust manifold should not be a limitation or a problem in any way.
__________________
.

Last edited by 94JZA80; 09-12-2009 at 12:31 PM..
Appreciate 0