View Single Post
      08-01-2009, 04:02 AM   #44
jon@karbonwerke
Second Lieutenant
jon@karbonwerke's Avatar
9
Rep
226
Posts

Drives: 335i E90
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by UdubBadger View Post
hmmm maybe I will get the f4 IS then... just gonna suck when I know I coulda had the 2.8 IS and been even 2 stops lower for a better shot.

I just don't think I wanna fork over the coin for it... I'm not even worried about the weight.
for a 70-200 i would definitely want IS...all the more so if getting the heavier 2.8 version. when shooting handheld all day with the 2.8IS, the weight does start getting to you eventually.

if i were to shoot on a crop body, i would definitely be using the 17-55 2.8IS as my main lens. i'm still waiting for canon to release a 20-70 2.8LII with IS
Appreciate 0