03-06-2024, 10:43 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
142
Rep 178
Posts |
X Drive VS Quattro- My Opinion owning both
I have always been a Quattro fan with almost every legacy Audi in my fleet at some point (Coupe Quattro- 1991, S6, 200, 90). I bought a BMW 530 X Drive after renting one in Germany (I love the tech and beauty of the G30). I also drive more snow miles than almost anyone (500 inches per season). I have Blizzak snow tires on all of my cars.
Surprisingly, the BMW Xdrive on my 530 has performed very well. The balance of this car seems very good. The stopping distance is better than my Audi A6. Driving aggressively in the snow outshined the Audi with the electronics a bit quicker to chime in than the Audi. The Audi allows you to do more without intervention, however the BMW seems safer (Intervenes quicker). Overall driving the BMW in the snow gave me a very high confidence! For deep snow (1-2 feet) from a stop going uphill, the Audi did better with less intervention. I did turn off the ESP on both cars to make the test fair. I always disengage when going uphill or tackling deep situations. I considered the G60 but think with the increased weight stopping distance would be longer. Overall I am very impressed with the BMW. I also like the ease of buttons to switch to Sport Mode when in the snow. This allows you to quickly hit the menu and change them. I like sport mode in the snow since it seems to offer you faster gear changing (Paddle holds higher RPMs or better efficiency, Chime in with feedback or if you own different systems. |
03-07-2024, 01:28 AM | #2 | |
Captain
693
Rep 853
Posts |
Quote:
This is one of the best articles you will ever read on Audi's engineering failures. It generated much hate during its time (as the truth often does), and Audi even banned this dude from new model testing, etc. Article is in German, but you can probably copy it into a translator for a rough translation: https://motor-kritik.de/classic/common/10121501.htm There is no more comprehensive take-down of the Audi approach, marketing, and Quattro systems (from a performance-vehicle perspective). |
|
Appreciate
1
xander_g1055.50 |
03-07-2024, 09:14 AM | #3 |
Enlisted Member
35
Rep 31
Posts |
The traditional Quattro setup has always been a bit of an engineering head-scratcher, and Audi as a company (incl. parent Volkswagen) has always been a stickler for convention and the status quo.
Consider this a tertiary effect of the company's strong ties to Porsche, personified in Ferdinand Piëch. Porsche, as is very well-known, has obsessively stuck by the strange rear-engine layout for the 911, even as their own efforts in the mid-rear engine layout have produced some of the world's greatest sports cars. Credit where it's due: The 911 is an amazing car. Perhaps this continued success in the face of engineering weirdness has encouraged Audi to press on with the odd longitudinal front-engine FWD-based AWD system that nobody else (save Subaru) would ever use. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2024, 03:41 PM | #4 | |
Captain
693
Rep 853
Posts |
Quote:
The article above covers this in detail. |
|
Appreciate
1
High Flier104.50 |
03-07-2024, 05:31 PM | #6 |
Major General
5203
Rep 5,608
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-07-2024, 05:38 PM | #7 | |
Brigadier General
4789
Rep 4,882
Posts |
Quote:
but all are nose heavy and forward of the front axle |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2024, 06:48 AM | #8 | |
Captain
693
Rep 853
Posts |
Quote:
As much as Haldex gets slagged off, it is actually quite good as a concept--it is just mounted the wrong way 'round in the cheaper Audis. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-08-2024, 01:39 PM | #9 | |
Enlisted Member
35
Rep 31
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2024, 03:48 AM | #10 |
Private First Class
142
Rep 178
Posts |
Will the new X1 being FWD-biased impact anything from a snow standpoint (Only front wheel biased in the lineup)
My statement at the top praised X Drive as a comparison to many other cars, however my 3 VWs (Haldex) and A6 (Torsion) all perform well (Less electronics). I would sum things up as on open road high-speed snow driving, the BMW would be my pick, but in a deep storm where I am stopped or need to pursue getting out of a plow drift, the Audi might perform better. Even with traction control off on my 530, I perceive I still can't get the full grunt of all wheels without some intervention from electronics vs my A6. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2024, 12:12 PM | #11 | |
Brigadier General
4789
Rep 4,882
Posts |
Quote:
the BMWs have a multiplate clutch in the transfer case, 4WD depends on the clutch actuation and cannot be permanent (will stop when the multiplate clutches overheat) so you might be right |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-09-2024, 09:13 PM | #12 |
Major General
5203
Rep 5,608
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-10-2024, 04:31 AM | #13 | |
Captain
693
Rep 853
Posts |
Quote:
The Torsen system is a heavy clunker. It is superior (within the Audi range) only in the sense that it can offer a rear-wheel bias to inherently FWD platforms, but this still doesn't negate the poor weight distribution. Haldex is similar to the BMW system, but since BMW bases its proper cars off of a RWD platform, the Haldex-style system is superior, as it is lighter, always rear-biased, and a simpler solution. |
|
Appreciate
1
CMK34.50 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|