|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
320d steptronic vs. manual
|
|
01-11-2006, 09:44 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
43
Rep 463
Posts |
320d steptronic vs. manual
My steptronic 320d is at the service centre now getting somethings done. A rattle fixed, CIP 20, and there was a service bulletin for something in the engine. The service advisor didn't know what it was called in english (and I forgot what it was in German) but he said it's to stop something leaking (but a very minor problem).
To get to the point, they gave me an E90 320d manual as a loaner. After the novelty wore off, I'm still glad I chose the steptronic for a couple of reasons. 1: In city traffic I found I was constantly shifting between 2nd and 3rd. Sometimes 4th if I was lucky. The steptronic is much more relaxing for obvious reasons. Although maybe I'm just getting lazy. 2: Fuel consumption. I found that the fuel consumption was much higher (10.2L/100km for the manual vs 8.9L/100km). I think this is due to the fact that the manual gives me a heavier foot. The BMW 6-speed encourages revving. 3: In my case, I found the steptronic to be a little faster off the mark than the manual because you can just plant your foot and go. Although someone who has been driving the 6-speed for a while would of course be faster because they know their gearing. What I like about the manual: Absolutely everything! If my driving wasn't 90% city I would have gotten it in a heartbeat! Gear changes are smooth, there's no gate vagueness, clutch engagement is effortless, and rev matching is extremely easy (I was able to do it about 80% of the time) What I like about the steptronic: Absolutely everything! Effortless city driving, shifts smoothly, gives me lower consumption (because I'm a little lighter on the pedal), and I can still change gears when I want. Note: I am in no way criticising either transmission. I'm simply making a comparison from my own experiences. Both transmissions are fantastic and the choice depends on whatever you like more.
__________________
E90 320d - Black Ext/Fluid Grey Int | Steptronic | Business Navigation | PDC | Sunroof | Alarm Exterior Pictures | Interior Pictures | Video |
01-11-2006, 09:57 AM | #3 | |
Brigadier General
281
Rep 3,924
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2011 E92 M3 - IB/Beige/Sycamore Wood/6MT/EDC/ZPP2/Nav/PDC/Heated Seats/iPod-USB/Enh. Audio
2008 E92 335i - Montego Blue/Black/Gray Poplar/6MT/ZPP/ZSP/Nav/PDC/Heated Seats/HDRadio/iPod-USB - Sold 2006 E90 330i - Mystic Blue/Black/Aluminum/6MT/ZPP/iDrive/PDC/Heated Seats/Sat. Prep - Sold 1994 E36 325i - Boston Green/Beige/Automatic/ZPP/Heated Seats/Premium Sound - Sold |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-11-2006, 10:34 AM | #4 | ||
Addict
203
Rep 2,074
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
The trick about getting the manual off the line, is to rev it into boost before letting go of the clutch (about 1700rpm)...with that...it flies off the line! I think the auto box is alot nicer for "city" driving, but when I test drove the auto - it kept pushing back into gear -when I would prefer to stay in 6th at low revs to overtake- instead of having the car downshift. They are both excellent transmissions suited for the E90 320d...You are so lucky you got to experience both in a daily commute. Also...I am the opposite of you. The second I see an auto box - my foot gains a couple of pounds... and my fuel cons flies through the roof. I borrowed an E46 325i a while ago (auto) and I pushed the cons from 11.1 to 13.9 in the 1 day I was driving it...and I was going easier on it then I do my car (because it was borrowed) hehe! Thanks for the write up :-) Always nice to hear about diesels.... |
||
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|