X5M beats Cayenne Turbo S

[Dve3431]

Hi guys,

Maybe i found and interesting link http://www.autozeitung.de/aktuelles-...eitung-08-2015 for some of you guys for your decision.

It's in german but in my opinion very helpful

0-100 km/h 4,0 s Porsche 3,8 s
0-200 km/h 14,4 s Porsche 14,2 s

Fuel consumption during test 17,7l /100 km ( 0,2 less than Porsche )

Most impressive: X5m beats Porsche on track by 0,8 seconds (on a track they didn't name, maybe own test track) and the breaks performed 0,3 m better in warm conditions than the ceramics of the Porsche.

Final comment of the author: "Respect to the M GmbH in Garching, what they have done to the X5m performance is just sensational, it is enough to beat the old bench

[AwesomeM3]

Nice! Way to go BMW M!

[Skywalker6]

I have just read the article myself. You have to pay to download it...

Very true, the X5M beats the Cayanne Turbo S in the overall test and on top is over EUR 50'000 cheaper than the Turbo S! The SUV crown is being passed over to the beast. ✌️
Now it'll get even harder to wait for the delivery of my X5M expected in the middle of June....

[Phatcat]

Originally Posted by Dve3431

Hi guys,

Maybe i found and interesting link http://www.autozeitung.de/aktuelles-...eitung-08-2015 for some of you guys for your decision.

It's in german but in my opinion very helpful

0-100 km/h 4,0 s Porsche 3,8 s
0-200 km/h 14,4 s Porsche 14,2 s

Fuel consumption during test 17,7l /100 km ( 0,2 less than Porsche )

Most impressive: X5m beats Porsche on track by 0,8 seconds (on a track they didn't name, maybe own test track) and the breaks performed 0,3 m better in warm conditions than the ceramics of the Porsche.

Final comment of the author: "Respect to the M GmbH in Garching, what they have done to the X5m performance is just sensational, it is enough to beat the old bench

Wow 0-200km in 14.4? I am impressed. E70 does it 16+ seconds, that's a significant improvement, less than 2 seconds off the M5.

[1MOREMOD]

Don't those numbers show the bmw 2 tenths slower to 100 and 200?

[Dve3431]

Originally Posted by 1MOREMOD

Don't those numbers show the bmw 2 tenths slower to 100 and 200?

You are right, but this was a test with more than just acceleration from 0-100

[MonacoJoe]

Originally Posted by 1MOREMOD

Don't those numbers show the bmw 2 tenths slower to 100 and 200?

ha - thats where i was at given the headline

sort of misleading OP...

esp. since track is unknown etc.

[1MOREMOD]

Okay thought my math was fuzzy?