F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > 2012-2019 BMW 3 and 4-Series Forums > General F30 Sedan / F32 Coupe / F36 Gran Coupe Forum > C&D review: 340i xDrive
GetBMWParts
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-04-2016, 04:32 PM   #1
NightWriter
Colonel
NightWriter's Avatar
4844
Rep
2,744
Posts

Drives: G80 M3 Pure
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

C&D review: 340i xDrive

Overall a very positive review, except (big surprise) for steering feedback. Even the explanation isn't entirely surprising, though it sure as hell is disappointing:
Asked why 3-series steering is less communicative these days, two BMW chassis engineers have told us that they could match the feedback provided by electric assist with what they used to provide with hydraulic power steering, but “our customers don’t want it.” This is what happens when your primary mission is chasing volume in an attempt to beat Mercedes-Benz and Lexus for the luxury-brand sales crown year after year.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ve-test-review
__________________
Appreciate 1
      04-04-2016, 05:02 PM   #2
chiefneil
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
772
Rep
1,502
Posts

Drives: 2014 335i M-Sport
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightWriter View Post
“our customers don’t want it.”
That's what I've thought for a while. I always figured the steering was pretty much where they wanted it. Although with the M3 and M2 you'd think they'd be chasing the more hardcore audience that wants more feedback.
Appreciate 3
      04-04-2016, 05:48 PM   #3
S6F
First Lieutenant
United_States
95
Rep
334
Posts

Drives: '19 540ixMsport
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Central NJ

iTrader: (1)

Curious as to why the 340s are always showing slower 1/4mi times than the cars they replaced even with better power numbers and better butt dyno impressions. This C&D article is a case in point.
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 05:51 PM   #4
crex
Captain
53
Rep
659
Posts

Drives: bmw 135i, Jeep wrangler
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NOVA

iTrader: (1)

I don't buy it. If they could have, they would have done it for the M3 too.
Appreciate 3
      04-04-2016, 06:01 PM   #5
goj
Brigadier General
goj's Avatar
United_States
2253
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: 2016 EBII 340i 6-MT
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevefoster
Curious as to why the 340s are always showing slower 1/4mi times than the cars they replaced even with better power numbers and better butt dyno impressions. This C&D article is a case in point.
All of them have been manuals so far. And also there could be some driver error because the RWD 340i was quicker launching than the AWD 340i (of course both manuals)
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04
Instagram: @brandons340i
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 06:05 PM   #6
auf Deutsch
Colonel
auf Deutsch's Avatar
United_States
1913
Rep
2,210
Posts

Drives: '17 jackrabbit on crystal meth
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Philly burbs

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW M2  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevefoster View Post
Curious as to why the 340s are always showing slower 1/4mi times than the cars they replaced even with better power numbers and better butt dyno impressions. This C&D article is a case in point.
Weight. The 340 weighs more than the 335, sad but true. The 335xi 8AT tested at 3739. This 340xi with lighter 6 speed tips the scales at 3802.
__________________
2017 BSM M2|6MT|Exec|black kidneys and gills|full alcantara wheel|CF spoiler|Dinan Stage 4|Dinan COI|Dinan free flow exhaust with resonator delete|Fabspeed sport cat DP|BMS clutch stop|465 bhp|4.75/5 stars

retired: 2014 435xi|MPPK|335 bhp|3/5 stars
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 06:21 PM   #7
goj
Brigadier General
goj's Avatar
United_States
2253
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: 2016 EBII 340i 6-MT
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by auf Deutsch
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevefoster View Post
Curious as to why the 340s are always showing slower 1/4mi times than the cars they replaced even with better power numbers and better butt dyno impressions. This C&D article is a case in point.
Weight. The 340 weighs more than the 335, sad but true. The 335xi 8AT tested at 3739. This 340xi with lighter 6 speed tips the scales at 3802.
Likely the driver...no way should a 0-60 be slower than the RWD version with same trans...extra weight or not.
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04
Instagram: @brandons340i
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 06:25 PM   #8
goj
Brigadier General
goj's Avatar
United_States
2253
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: 2016 EBII 340i 6-MT
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightWriter
Overall a very positive review, except (big surprise) for steering feedback. Even the explanation isn't entirely surprising, though it sure as hell is disappointing:
Asked why 3-series steering is less communicative these days, two BMW chassis engineers have told us that they could match the feedback provided by electric assist with what they used to provide with hydraulic power steering, but “our customers don’t want it.” This is what happens when your primary mission is chasing volume in an attempt to beat Mercedes-Benz and Lexus for the luxury-brand sales crown year after year.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ve-test-review
Very positive review, I do have to say the C&D commenters really love to hate on BMW
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04
Instagram: @brandons340i
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 06:31 PM   #9
NightWriter
Colonel
NightWriter's Avatar
4844
Rep
2,744
Posts

Drives: G80 M3 Pure
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevefoster View Post
Curious as to why the 340s are always showing slower 1/4mi times than the cars they replaced even with better power numbers and better butt dyno impressions. This C&D article is a case in point.
There's a lot of variables in 0-60 times, especially with a manual. They still haven't tested a 340i xDrive 8-sp with the track package, most likely the quickest combination.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 07:04 PM   #10
scostu
Colonel
scostu's Avatar
United_States
1623
Rep
2,036
Posts

Drives: 2016 F25
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Space Coast Florida...aka NASA area

iTrader: (0)

[QUOTE=NightWriter;19696333]Overall a very positive review, except (big surprise) for steering feedback. Even the explanation isn't entirely surprising, though it sure as hell is disappointing:
Asked why 3-series steering is less communicative these days, two BMW chassis engineers have told us that they could match the feedback provided by electric assist with what they used to provide with hydraulic power steering, but “our customers don’t want it.” This is what happens when your primary mission is chasing volume in an attempt to beat Mercedes-Benz and Lexus for the luxury-brand sales crown year after year.
So for those "that DO want it" , which is probably everyone in this entire forum, what is the fix?

Anyone have ideas or insight? Is it a simple module, coding, hardwear....?!

If its simple coding or a module to fix my F series to feel like my old E90.... i would pay money!
__________________
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 07:14 PM   #11
ErkanTR16
64-bit
ErkanTR16's Avatar
United_States
598
Rep
814
Posts

Drives: 2018 BMW 340i xDrive
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Love everything about my 340i xDrive. It hauls ass for sure.
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 07:56 PM   #12
bimmercar
Captain
United_States
182
Rep
765
Posts

Drives: 340xi
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Northeast US

iTrader: (0)

strange that the xdrive 0-60 time is slower than official bmw time, even with MPSS
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 08:01 PM   #13
paul e
Captain
420
Rep
842
Posts

Drives: 340i xDrive 6MT
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (0)

Odd that they could just make the E90 steering feel an iDrive option if they wanted to. Why not give the option and make everybody happy? Isn't that what the technology is for?
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 08:58 PM   #14
Blubaron79
Brigadier General
Blubaron79's Avatar
United_States
1435
Rep
4,724
Posts

Drives: 2021 M340i xDrive
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PA

iTrader: (0)

Magazines just say that about BMWs now because it's the vogue thing to do.
__________________
Current: 2021 M340i xDrive

Previous: '18 340i xDrive; '15 335 xDrive; '14 435i xDrive; '09 335 E92 xDrive
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 09:30 PM   #15
300hp
Brigadier General
317
Rep
3,619
Posts

Drives: X5 & 335xi
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

The E9X 335i x drive manual did 4.7 to 60 (C/D test). This was the version with the N55. Quite keen to see how the AT performs but all of the 340i tests are making my decision to sit out on the LCI and hang on to my 335hp N55 a tad more palatable.

Let's hope the AT tests make me eat my words
__________________
EBII 2014 335i xDrive
335HP, Sport AT, 19" Wheels, MPE, Prem, Tech, Cold, HK, Driver Assist & DH pkgs

Deep Sea Blue Metallic 2013 X5 35d Sport
Prem, Convenience, Cold and Premium Sound packages
Appreciate 0
      04-04-2016, 09:55 PM   #16
eluded
2JZ-GTE
eluded's Avatar
Bulgaria
3045
Rep
3,997
Posts

Drives: 340 6MT, 50e, others
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Sofia

iTrader: (0)

odd the 340 was faster (a tenth) than the 340X; and in triple digits a lot faster. Very interesting. Awesome that C&D only reviewing the manuals, #SaveTheManuals !!!
Appreciate 2
      04-04-2016, 10:23 PM   #17
goj
Brigadier General
goj's Avatar
United_States
2253
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: 2016 EBII 340i 6-MT
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by eluded
odd the 340 was faster (a tenth) than the 340X; and in triple digits a lot faster. Very interesting. Awesome that C&D only reviewing the manuals, #SaveTheManuals !!!
Ahh BMW is sending them the manuals. They are trying to give the message that they are an enthusiast option. Most likely since the entire competition has left the stick shift
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04
Instagram: @brandons340i
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2016, 06:39 AM   #18
2015M4inCT
Private First Class
96
Rep
199
Posts

Drives: 2015 M4
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by goj View Post
Ahh BMW is sending them the manuals. They are trying to give the message that they are an enthusiast option. Most likely since the entire competition has left the stick shift
Should have included the M-Sport package too.

Wonder how much longer BMW will keep the manuals. If none of their competition are doing it... I suppose sales numbers are the key. Curious what they were on the S4/S5 now that Audi has ditched the manual.

Once manuals go I may be forced to have two cars. Been always leasing and having a fun daily driver in stick.

Screw 0-60 times. I want to feel connected to the car through that pedal and stick. BMW hasn't figured out how to dial out the feel, tactile sensations, vibrations from there yet to keep their customers happy!
Appreciate 1
      04-05-2016, 08:12 AM   #19
bahasad
Major
bahasad's Avatar
United_States
327
Rep
1,490
Posts

Drives: F30, E90
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Somewhereinamerica

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightWriter View Post
Overall a very positive review, except (big surprise) for steering feedback. Even the explanation isn't entirely surprising, though it sure as hell is disappointing:
Asked why 3-series steering is less communicative these days, two BMW chassis engineers have told us that they could match the feedback provided by electric assist with what they used to provide with hydraulic power steering, but “our customers don’t want it.” This is what happens when your primary mission is chasing volume in an attempt to beat Mercedes-Benz and Lexus for the luxury-brand sales crown year after year.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ve-test-review
Very disappointing explanation from the engineers for the lack of feedback. BMWs core audience have been enthusiasts/sporty oriented drivers. By alienating us, and going after the non discerning customer, eventually it will catch up to them.
__________________
Current: 17 Mustang GT no bmw
Gone but not forgotten: 07 E90 335I, 04 UA6, 95 E36, 04 EP3, 16 S550 EB, 14 F30 328I Stg 1, 08 E90 328I
Appreciate 3
      04-05-2016, 08:24 AM   #20
goj
Brigadier General
goj's Avatar
United_States
2253
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: 2016 EBII 340i 6-MT
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 340i6MT
Quote:
Originally Posted by goj View Post
Ahh BMW is sending them the manuals. They are trying to give the message that they are an enthusiast option. Most likely since the entire competition has left the stick shift
Should have included the M-Sport package too.

Wonder how much longer BMW will keep the manuals. If none of their competition are doing it... I suppose sales numbers are the key. Curious what they were on the S4/S5 now that Audi has ditched the manual.

Once manuals go I may be forced to have two cars. Been always leasing and having a fun daily driver in stick.

Screw 0-60 times. I want to feel connected to the car through that pedal and stick. BMW hasn't figured out how to dial out the feel, tactile sensations, vibrations from there yet to keep their customers happy!
With double digit take rates of the manual transmissions BMW won't throw them out. If that drops then they're in danger.
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04
Instagram: @brandons340i
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2016, 08:29 AM   #21
Prossx
First Lieutenant
Prossx's Avatar
293
Rep
379
Posts

Drives: 21 G82 6MT SPY/YMB
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Kansas City

iTrader: (0)

If the goal is to achieve ever increasing levels of refinement, then yes, filtering out steering feel is going to happen. The typical "luxury" customer doesn't want to feel road imperfections and vibration make their way to the wheel much less into the cabin. I also wonder if its just easier for crash test scores/safety, to engineer more isolated sub systems (sub frames/ crumple zones/ collapsable steering columns, etc) to achieve this refinement and not have to figure out how transmit some level of feel thru all these systems. The engineers probably don't want to get into those discussions.
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2016, 08:36 AM   #22
vtown
Private First Class
vtown's Avatar
United_States
99
Rep
132
Posts

Drives: 2013 335i
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: CT

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blubaron79 View Post
Magazines just say that about BMWs now because it's the vogue thing to do.
I agree. The mags are all on the hater bandwagon. After all these years gushing over the 3 they finally decided to hate on something. Now they are like a dog with a bone.

Sure it's a bit lighter. But to imply that it sucks is just silly.

From all the negative press. I was fully prepared to hate the f30 steering. Then I drove one (albeit without vss), it's still very good imo.

You want the old unrefined steering feel? Stick with the old unrefined car....

Last edited by vtown; 04-05-2016 at 08:43 AM..
Appreciate 2
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 AM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST