F30POST
F30POST
2012-2015 BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
BMW 3-Series and 4-Series Forum (F30 / F32) | F30POST > Technical Forums > B58 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications > 340 MPPSK Dyno Run
GetBMWParts
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      01-27-2017, 09:43 AM   #1
Frank Jia
Private First Class
Frank Jia's Avatar
67
Rep
111
Posts

Drives: BMW 340i MPPSK
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Post

Modification list:
MPPSK
K&N highflow drop in filter
CG Precision DS-1 Race Catted Downpipe
Run with 98 RON (similar 93octane of US) of Australia

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63626[/IMG]

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63624[/IMG]

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63625[/IMG]

I had two dyno tests of my car with different weathers.
First graph tested on a hot day with 34°C.
Second and third graphs tested today, a drizzling day with only 21°C.
Their maxpower showed 328.2hp and 343.2hp with amazing 15hp rear wheel HP gap.
Engine crank HP calculated are 393HP and 410HP with about 16% loss to RWHP.

First run

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63628[/IMG]

__________________________________________________ ___________________________

Second run

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63629[/IMG]

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63627[/IMG]

I just ordered Active8 tune and AA need my Dyno data for maping my tune.
I will post more dyno data after Active8 tune installed for comparison with stock MPPSK.

Last edited by Frank Jia; 01-27-2017 at 09:53 AM..
Appreciate 3
Beek705.50
Big Nodge381.00
      01-27-2017, 12:27 PM   #2
riskmaker76
Lieutenant
126
Rep
484
Posts

Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

Cant wait!!!! Just ordered new 2017 440 with MPPSK... Have been wondering if AA / JB4 add much....

Looking forward.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2017, 01:38 PM   #3
FeelinBlessed
Lieutenant
FeelinBlessed's Avatar
227
Rep
418
Posts

Drives: 2017 340i AW MPPSK/Track
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW  [0.00]
pretty disappointing.... I was hoping for more
__________________
///MPPSK///MP FRONT SPLITTER///MP KIDNEY GRILLS///CF MIRRORS///CF SPOILER///CF TIPS///HUPER OPTIK 20%///NBT///AC SCHNITZER///M4 437M///ZMP///ZTR///iND///
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2017, 02:05 PM   #4
jalkster
Lieutenant
220
Rep
579
Posts

Drives: X3MC
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (3)

I wonder how much potential those kittys are holding
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2017, 03:04 PM   #5
riskmaker76
Lieutenant
126
Rep
484
Posts

Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

I went back to see what the stock dyno stats are... something doesn't make sense unless the Dyno machine makes the difference but it looks like your MPPSK is actually the same or slower then a stock car...

using this as a point of reference..
http://www.n54tech.com/forums/showthread.php?t=35355

I suspect with your setup is holding you back or the dynos are that far off..




Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Jia View Post
Modification list:
MPPSK
K&N highflow drop in filter
CG Precision DS-1 Race Catted Downpipe
Run with 98 RON (similar 93octane of US) of Australia

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63626[/IMG]

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63624[/IMG]

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63625[/IMG]

I had two dyno tests of my car with different weathers.
First graph tested on a hot day with 34°C.
Second and third graphs tested today, a drizzling day with only 21°C.
Their maxpower showed 328.2hp and 343.2hp with amazing 15hp rear wheel HP gap.
Engine crank HP calculated are 393HP and 410HP with about 16% loss to RWHP.

First run

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63628[/IMG]

__________________________________________________ ___________________________

Second run

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63629[/IMG]

[IMG]http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/pic...ictureid=63627[/IMG]

I just ordered Active8 tune and AA need my Dyno data for maping my tune.
I will post more dyno data after Active8 tune installed for comparison with stock MPPSK.
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2017, 05:49 PM   #6
mannymazz
Second Lieutenant
74
Rep
252
Posts

Drives: 440
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Brooklyn

iTrader: (0)

These numbers seem very low, even with differences in dynos, many people seem to be getting over 320 stock. Any thoughts?
Appreciate 0
      01-27-2017, 08:29 PM   #7
goj
Brigadier General
goj's Avatar
United_States
2252
Rep
3,622
Posts

Drives: 2016 EBII 340i 6-MT
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by FeelinBlessed View Post
pretty disappointing.... I was hoping for more
Without a baseline run these numbers don't tell you much. I wouldn't worry
__________________
BMW CCA Member #516012
2016 340i, Estoril Blue, Manual Transmission, MPE, MPBBK, HRE FF04
Instagram: @brandons340i
Appreciate 1
      01-27-2017, 10:07 PM   #8
BASELINE
Lieutenant
136
Rep
401
Posts

Drives: A few...
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Canaan, CT

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by goj View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeelinBlessed View Post
pretty disappointing.... I was hoping for more
Without a baseline run these numbers don't tell you much. I wouldn't worry
Agreed... don't worry about what people are saying regarding it being "slower than stock". Even the same exact dyno can be calibrated to read differently. Just cause some get 320 stock on a dynojet should have no bearing on your MPSK run on a Dyno Dynamics. Getting a baseline would have been the best way to go...but hindsight is 20/20.

You could always get some pulls done at a different machine, you'll see a significant spread between the two I'm sure.
Appreciate 0
      01-28-2017, 03:29 AM   #9
eluded
2JZ-GTE
eluded's Avatar
Bulgaria
2959
Rep
3,948
Posts

Drives: 340 6MT, 50e, others
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Sofia

iTrader: (0)

Mppsk + DP
Appreciate 0
      01-29-2017, 06:15 PM   #10
riskmaker76
Lieutenant
126
Rep
484
Posts

Drives: 440 xi MPPSK JB4
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Socialist People's State of NY - Long Island, NY

iTrader: (0)

Didn't know that they could be that different.

I agree though knowing the difference is where it's at.

Looking forward to see the results .


Quote:
Originally Posted by BASELINE View Post
Agreed... don't worry about what people are saying regarding it being "slower than stock". Even the same exact dyno can be calibrated to read differently. Just cause some get 320 stock on a dynojet should have no bearing on your MPSK run on a Dyno Dynamics. Getting a baseline would have been the best way to go...but hindsight is 20/20.

You could always get some pulls done at a different machine, you'll see a significant spread between the two I'm sure.
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2017, 10:53 AM   #11
Boost75
Enlisted Member
Canada
0
Rep
37
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW 435I M sport X drive
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Oak ridges

iTrader: (0)

what are the stock hp numbers for the 340 ? with and without MPPSK.
are they much more then a 335 with MPPSK?
thanks
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2017, 11:28 AM   #12
BASELINE
Lieutenant
136
Rep
401
Posts

Drives: A few...
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Canaan, CT

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boost75 View Post
what are the stock hp numbers for the 340 ? with and without MPPSK.
are they much more then a 335 with MPPSK?
thanks
There was a member that did a before and after on a dynojet somewhere around here and I want to say it was as claimed... around 35whp delta
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2017, 11:28 AM   #13
Eriphill
Lieutenant Colonel
Eriphill's Avatar
2564
Rep
1,710
Posts

Drives: 340i
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Down by the sea

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boost75 View Post
what are the stock hp numbers for the 340 ? with and without MPPSK.
are they much more then a 335 with MPPSK?
thanks
http://f30.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1313152
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2017, 01:44 PM   #14
Boost75
Enlisted Member
Canada
0
Rep
37
Posts

Drives: 2014 BMW 435I M sport X drive
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Oak ridges

iTrader: (0)

thanks i just checked out the link.
i cant believe the stock numbers, let alone the gains.

i have a 2014 435i m sport with MPPK exhaust and software form factory.
they claim 32hp 37tq approx. is this number to the rear wheels?

to be honest with you, it does seem faster then the numbers claimed.

"What was the 435i last year is now the 440i, and its new 3.0-liter turbocharged inline-six spins up 320 horsepower and 330 lb-ft, up 20 and 30 over last year’s 3.0-liter six. "
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2017, 05:37 PM   #15
Sheharyar_rr
First Lieutenant
Canada
235
Rep
312
Posts

Drives: 14' 335xi M-Sport
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Ontario

iTrader: (0)

I know its a bit off topic but can you post sound clips of the exhaust with downpipe? been dying to hear MPPSK with Downpipe
__________________
2021 M5 Competition | Imola red
2020 Z4 M40i | Misano blue Pure850/PI/LPFP
Gone: 2018 M550i xDrive | DME Tuning BEF / JB4 / BM3 / DPs | 10.95 @ 125 1/4 Mile
Gone: 2014 335i xDrive | Bootmod3 Stage 2 93 Map | 12.2 @ 113 1/4 Mile
Appreciate 0
      01-30-2017, 10:05 PM   #16
BLACK HAWK DOWN
Second Lieutenant
BLACK HAWK DOWN's Avatar
Canada
105
Rep
259
Posts

Drives: 16' AW 340i xDrive
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Orwelian Paradise

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
OP I've got two questions.
1) what front fenders are you running on that F30? I see M vents.
2) did you get a check engine light running the CG Catted Downpipe?
Appreciate 0
      02-03-2017, 12:15 PM   #17
Remonster
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
821
Rep
1,583
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by riskmaker76 View Post
Didn't know that they could be that different.

I agree though knowing the difference is where it's at.

Looking forward to see the results .
It's very, very hard to compare any results from one dyno to the next. The brand or type of dyno makes a huge difference and differences in calibration, correction factors used, etc. can also make a big difference.

As an example, I put my old M3 on two different dynos within a few days of each other and the difference between them was 17%. My car ran multiple more times on one of those two dynos and always measured within 1-2% so it wasn't the car suddenly making more or less power.
Appreciate 0
      02-03-2017, 01:39 PM   #18
rockymtnpilot
Private First Class
74
Rep
126
Posts

Drives: 2017 BMW 340i
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Denver, CO

iTrader: (0)

Seconding the request for where you got those front quarter panels. They are magnificent.
__________________
2017 340i xDrive
MPPSK
More to come
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
b58 340i mppsk active8 dyno

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:39 AM.




f30post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST