BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
BIMMERPOST Universal Forums General Automotive (non-BMW) Talk + Photos/Videos New Audi RS5 info (engine + weight figures)

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-19-2008, 05:19 PM   #1
hks786
Major General
United Kingdom
2169
Rep
5,364
Posts

Drives: *
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Exclamation New Audi RS5 info (engine + weight figures)

Engine:

4.2 V8. 470bhp, 500Nm
7s S-tronic

Weight:

1702kg. It looks like it's going to be more nose heavy than the S5.

Design:

Test mules are running around with the new front bumper. It has big side intakes like the A3 Clubsport. Should be interesting!

On a side note, I seen a silver S5 with RS4 wheels today. It looked MEAN! I can only imagine the presence the RS5 will have on the road.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 05:33 PM   #2
!Xoible
Banned
United_States
837
Rep
46,029
Posts

Drives: ....
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 M3  [4.00]
2007 335i  [9.00]
2008 528i  [8.00]
2006 Infiniti - G35 ...  [8.00]
every time i buy a new car it somehow turns out to be the slowest car in the competition
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 05:35 PM   #3
Crimson92
Smiling Politely
Crimson92's Avatar
United_States
1381
Rep
29,118
Posts

Drives: Like a boss
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Whales Vagina

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///Mantis View Post
every time i buy a new car it somehow turns out to be the slowest car in the competition
it happens bro...that being said...my car will be very dated
__________________
Quote:
Some people are like slinkies...not really good for much but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs"
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 05:37 PM   #4
Year's_End
Lieutenant General
Year's_End's Avatar
United_States
1138
Rep
12,444
Posts

Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

What'd they do to that V8 in order to get another 50 bhp/52 lb-ft out of it?

And 1702 kg comes out to be 3752 lbs.

To put that in perspective, an Audi RS4 has 420 bhp/317 lb-ft motivating 3415 pounds of mass.

Hmmm...don't know if it'll be much faster. It has another 300 lbs to move, and only 50 more hp/tq to help.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT
Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 05:44 PM   #5
!Xoible
Banned
United_States
837
Rep
46,029
Posts

Drives: ....
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 M3  [4.00]
2007 335i  [9.00]
2008 528i  [8.00]
2006 Infiniti - G35 ...  [8.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crimson92 View Post
it happens bro...that being said...my car will be very dated
i dont think there's a car as much fun as that in the market today, maybe lotus elise
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 05:45 PM   #6
!Xoible
Banned
United_States
837
Rep
46,029
Posts

Drives: ....
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 M3  [4.00]
2007 335i  [9.00]
2008 528i  [8.00]
2006 Infiniti - G35 ...  [8.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bimmer Loyalist View Post
What'd they do to that V8 in order to get another 50 bhp/52 lb-ft out of it?

And 1702 kg comes out to be 3752 lbs.

To put that in perspective, an Audi RS4 has 420 bhp/317 lb-ft motivating 3415 pounds of mass.

Hmmm...don't know if it'll be much faster. It has another 300 lbs to move, and only 50 more hp/tq to help.
gearing, chassis different?

that's more hp/torque than M3, and weighs as much i want a C63 now

did i just say that???
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 05:55 PM   #7
Year's_End
Lieutenant General
Year's_End's Avatar
United_States
1138
Rep
12,444
Posts

Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///Mantis View Post
gearing, chassis different?

that's more hp/torque than M3, and weighs as much i want a C63 now

did i just say that???
How does gearing/chassis tweaks change horsepower at the crank?

And yeah, the C63 is badass.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT
Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 05:58 PM   #8
!Xoible
Banned
United_States
837
Rep
46,029
Posts

Drives: ....
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 M3  [4.00]
2007 335i  [9.00]
2008 528i  [8.00]
2006 Infiniti - G35 ...  [8.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bimmer Loyalist View Post
How does gearing/chassis tweaks change horsepower at the crank?

And yeah, the C63 is badass.
no no... im saying it might be faster than RS4 if they improve chassis/gearing. i didnt say anything about at the crank
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 06:10 PM   #9
Crimson92
Smiling Politely
Crimson92's Avatar
United_States
1381
Rep
29,118
Posts

Drives: Like a boss
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Whales Vagina

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///Mantis View Post
i dont think there's a car as much fun as that in the market today, maybe lotus elise
i hope the 370z can prove to be better

Quote:
Originally Posted by ///Mantis View Post
gearing, chassis different?

that's more hp/torque than M3, and weighs as much i want a C63 now

did i just say that???


nothing wrong with wanting a c63 lol
__________________
Quote:
Some people are like slinkies...not really good for much but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs"
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 06:22 PM   #10
OBI_agent
D to the X to the B!
OBI_agent's Avatar
United Arab Emirates
345
Rep
2,106
Posts

Drives: ABS,American bargain supercar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bimmer Loyalist View Post
What'd they do to that V8 in order to get another 50 bhp/52 lb-ft out of it?

And 1702 kg comes out to be 3752 lbs.

To put that in perspective, an Audi RS4 has 420 bhp/317 lb-ft motivating 3415 pounds of mass.

Hmmm...don't know if it'll be much faster. It has another 300 lbs to move, and only 50 more hp/tq to help.
+1.....yeh I'm curious on how they got the torque to increase by that much?? I have never seen or heard of a naturally aspirated car carrying a 90lb-ft/liter figure(If it's the same displacement 369lb-ft/4.2=around 90)

Hmm...if the hp and torque figures are true, I think they are increasing a displacement. I am hoping it's forced induction but many reports point that its unlikely to be applied

And bimmer, RS4 doesn't weigh 3415pounds...it weighs around 3848 pounds (tested by edmunds). So that makes the RS5 lighter by around 100 pounds.
__________________
11 corvette C6
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 06:25 PM   #11
!Xoible
Banned
United_States
837
Rep
46,029
Posts

Drives: ....
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: .

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
2008 M3  [4.00]
2007 335i  [9.00]
2008 528i  [8.00]
2006 Infiniti - G35 ...  [8.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crimson92 View Post
i hope the 370z can prove to be better





nothing wrong with wanting a c63 lol
if it revs past 8k RPM it'll be very interesting

nothing wrong with wanting a merc for u... but after all the hate i posted about the car i cannot like it bro
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 07:02 PM   #12
Year's_End
Lieutenant General
Year's_End's Avatar
United_States
1138
Rep
12,444
Posts

Drives: 2020 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBI_agent View Post
And bimmer, RS4 doesn't weigh 3415pounds...it weighs around 3848 pounds (tested by edmunds). So that makes the RS5 lighter by around 100 pounds.
Haha wow I can't believe I didn't catch that mistake. I just pulled the number off some site when I searched for the curb weight.
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT
Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 07:11 PM   #13
M3350Z
Second Lieutenant
M3350Z's Avatar
United_States
39
Rep
270
Posts

Drives: E92 335i MT
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New York

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by hks786 View Post
Engine:

4.2 V8. 470bhp, 500Nm
7s S-tronic

Weight:

1702kg. It looks like it's going to be more nose heavy than the S5.

Design:

Test mules are running around with the new front bumper. It has big side intakes like the A3 Clubsport. Should be interesting!

On a side note, I seen a silver S5 with RS4 wheels today. It looked MEAN! I can only imagine the presence the RS5 will have on the road.
Wait...are you saying no MT?
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 07:45 PM   #14
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
611
Rep
10,407
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OBI_agent View Post
+1.....yeh I'm curious on how they got the torque to increase by that much?? I have never seen or heard of a naturally aspirated car carrying a 90lb-ft/liter figure(If it's the same displacement 369lb-ft/4.2=around 90)

Hmm...if the hp and torque figures are true, I think they are increasing a displacement. I am hoping it's forced induction but many reports point that its unlikely to be applied
Spot on. F430 Scuderia is at about 80 ft lb/liter. Audi is not going to squeeze 13% more torque per liter from a naturally aspirated engine. One of three possibilities only.

1. Displacement is wrong
2. Torque is wrong
3. It will get FI
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2008, 07:57 PM   #15
hks786
Major General
United Kingdom
2169
Rep
5,364
Posts

Drives: *
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Spot on. F430 Scuderia is at about 80 ft lb/liter. Audi is not going to squeeze 13% more torque per liter from a naturally aspirated engine. One of three possibilities only.

1. Displacement is wrong
2. Torque is wrong
3. It will get FI
It's number 2. I think.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2008, 09:31 AM   #16
JayML
Lieutenant
77
Rep
413
Posts

Drives: ....
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: toronto

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bimmer Loyalist View Post
To put that in perspective, an Audi RS4 has 420 bhp/317 lb-ft motivating 3415 pounds of mass.

Hmmm...don't know if it'll be much faster. It has another 300 lbs to move, and only 50 more hp/tq to help.
the rs4 weighs nowhere near 3400 pounds

its around 3650

dont know where you got your info from
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2008, 09:38 AM   #17
OBI_agent
D to the X to the B!
OBI_agent's Avatar
United Arab Emirates
345
Rep
2,106
Posts

Drives: ABS,American bargain supercar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dubai

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Spot on. F430 Scuderia is at about 80 ft lb/liter. Audi is not going to squeeze 13% more torque per liter from a naturally aspirated engine. One of three possibilities only.

1. Displacement is wrong
2. Torque is wrong
3. It will get FI
Yeh....the torque figure could be wrong....thanks for pointing that out...I never thought about it
__________________
11 corvette C6
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2008, 09:43 AM   #18
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
KonigsTiger's Avatar
118
Rep
4,391
Posts

Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

iTrader: (0)

Well, I'm cetain of one thing, its going to be a great looking car with great performance.
__________________
==================================================
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2008, 10:05 AM   #19
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
1118
Rep
8,016
Posts

Drives: i5M60
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: No where fast

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Is it known whether the engine is still N/A or FI?

If it's N/A and still 4.2L then to get that amount of power would require a higher rev range. The new DSG is capable of 550Nm and 9000rpm, does this mean the new engine is revving closer to that limit, says 8600rpm.

I read somewhere that Valve-lift can increase torque by up to 12%, that would improve the 75ft/lbs per litre of the RS4 engine to 84ft/lbs, that is getting pretty close to the 90ft/lbs being suggested by hkz786. But then look at the S5 engine, it's at 77ft/lbs, add the same 12% improvement and you are at 86ft/lbs. Maybe this figure is starting to look a lot more believable than first thought.
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2008, 10:28 AM   #20
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
KonigsTiger's Avatar
118
Rep
4,391
Posts

Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by footie View Post
Is it known whether the engine is still N/A or FI?

If it's N/A and still 4.2L then to get that amount of power would require a higher rev range. The new DSG is capable of 550Nm and 9000rpm, does this mean the new engine is revving closer to that limit, says 8600rpm.

I read somewhere that Valve-lift can increase torque by up to 12%, that would improve the 75ft/lbs per litre of the RS4 engine to 84ft/lbs, that is getting pretty close to the 90ft/lbs being suggested by hkz786. But then look at the S5 engine, it's at 77ft/lbs, add the same 12% improvement and you are at 86ft/lbs. Maybe this figure is starting to look a lot more believable than first thought.
Well, we know the new RS6 engines is an FI V10. I doubt that Audi will push the 4.2 V8 to 8,600 RPM or so, my bet is FI.
__________________
==================================================
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2008, 10:31 AM   #21
footie
Major General
footie's Avatar
1118
Rep
8,016
Posts

Drives: i5M60
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: No where fast

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by BMW-M-Mexico View Post
Well, we know the new RS6 engines is an FI V10. I doubt that Audi will puch the 4.2 V8 to 8,600 RPM or so, my bet is FI.
I know and agree, I was only showing how it might be possible to get the desired figure in question.
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2008, 10:43 AM   #22
KonigsTiger
Racying Dynamics
KonigsTiger's Avatar
118
Rep
4,391
Posts

Drives: E92M3 RS46 Club Sport, others
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dweller

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by footie View Post
I know and agree, I was only showing how it might be possible to get the desired figure in question.

__________________
==================================================
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:18 AM.




5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST