THE LARGEST BMW 2-SERIES FORUM ON THE PLANET
2Addicts
2Addicts
BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
2Addicts | BMW 2-Series forum BMW 2 Series (F22) Forum BMW 2 Series Coupe and Cabriolet (F22/F23) General Forum Why are the EPA Fuel Economy ratings different for model year 2017,18,19, & 20 M240i

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      04-20-2020, 02:51 AM   #1
rodybmw
Enlisted Member
rodybmw's Avatar
United_States
31
Rep
31
Posts

Drives: 2022 i4 M50 / 2011 335is Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA

iTrader: (0)

Why are the EPA Fuel Economy ratings different for model year 2017,18,19, & 20 M240i

I tried searching for the answer to my question, but couldn't find any posts addressing it. I had a 2015 228xi which was totaled a few months ago and now I'm looking into replacing it with an M240i. Looking at sales listings for the M240i I noticed there are differing EPA fuel economy numbers for the different model year M240i's. Model year 2018 and 2019 are the same, but are different from 2017, and all three are different from 2020. Did BMW make any changes to the engine or anything else that would make an impact on the fuel economy of the deferent model year M240i's? Here are the EPA ratings in Miles Per Gallon for an Automatic transmission M240i Coupe:

2017: City 21, Highway 32, Combined 25
2018: City 21, Highway 30, Combined 24
2019: City 21, Highway 30, Combined 24
2020: City 22, Highway 30, Combined 25

The reason I ask isn't so much that I'm concerned about a difference of 1 or 2 MPG from year to year, but just to clarify what is the reason for the different fuel economy ratings for the same car with seemingly the same engine and drivetrain.

Thanks in Advance for the info.
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2020, 08:23 AM   #2
USA-RET
Captain
USA-RET's Avatar
605
Rep
970
Posts

Drives: Estoril Blue M240i
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: SW Florida

iTrader: (0)

I believe the EPA rates each new model for MPG. Variance is likely to the day they do the test and changes to their testing methodology.

FYI

https://www.epa.gov/fueleconomy
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2020, 10:24 AM   #3
Throttlesteer14
Captain
Throttlesteer14's Avatar
United_States
1101
Rep
649
Posts

Drives: 17 M240 ix, 14 Cayman S
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Washington

iTrader: (0)

The difference in fuel economy is likely going to be more related to your driving style than the EPA ratings. It will all come down to how heavy your right foot is.
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2020, 11:44 AM   #4
harma24
Captain
United_States
403
Rep
744
Posts

Drives: 2017 M240i Glacier Silver
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: 19.5mi NNW of Boston, MA

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2017 BMW M240i  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Throttlesteer14 View Post
It will all come down to how heavy your right foot is.
And how heavy the traffic is. I'd love to hit 21mpg on my commute. In normal Boston traffic, I average <20.
__________________
Fun Cars (daily drivers) 2001-2016: 2001 Honda Prelude | 2016 - present: 2017 M240xi Glacier Silver Coupe
Family Cars: 1993-2014: 1993 Honda Accord 10th Anniversary Edition | 2014-Present: 2014 Honda Odyssey
Stable-mate: 2019 - present: 2020 230xi Seaside Blue Convertible
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2020, 11:49 AM   #5
H2O_Doc
First Lieutenant
H2O_Doc's Avatar
United_States
513
Rep
357
Posts

Drives: BMW M2C, GLB-250, C7 Z51
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: VA

iTrader: (0)

This might help explain some of it:


https://www.edmunds.com/fuel-economy...a-ratings.html
Appreciate 1
dradernh4413.00
      04-20-2020, 12:24 PM   #6
dradernh
Brigadier General
dradernh's Avatar
4413
Rep
3,497
Posts

Drives: 2017 M240i
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: SW Ohio

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O_Doc View Post
This might help explain some of it:
That's an excellent piece. I think we can consider curb weight differences to have some effect as well.
__________________
2017 M240i: 23.8K, 28.9 mpg, MT, Sunroof Delete, 3,432#, EB, Leather, Driving Assistance Package, Heated Front Seats | Sold: E12 530i, E24 M635CSi, E39 520i, E30 325is, E36 M3 (2)
TC Kline Coilovers; H&R Front Bar; Wavetrac; Al Subframe Bushings; 18X9/9½ ARC-8s; 255/35-18 PS4S (4); Dinan Elite V2 & CAI; MPerf Orange BBK; Schroth Quick Fit Pro;
GTechniq Crystal Serum Ultra Ceramic; Suntek PPF
Appreciate 1
H2O_Doc512.50
      04-20-2020, 01:09 PM   #7
cristo
Second Lieutenant
United_States
133
Rep
218
Posts

Drives: 2020 M240i Convertible
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: York, PA

iTrader: (0)

Lighter grade oil viscosity recommendations,
fine tuning and tweaks in ECU and comfort/ECO
mode, and other similar things can make a small
difference, too.
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2020, 07:50 PM   #8
rodybmw
Enlisted Member
rodybmw's Avatar
United_States
31
Rep
31
Posts

Drives: 2022 i4 M50 / 2011 335is Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA USA

iTrader: (0)

Thanks for your replies to my question everyone! I do understand that the biggest factors in fuel economy are driving style, environment, using A/C, and many other things. As an example, when my son drove the now-totaled 228xi the fuel economy that he would get would be between 20 and 21 MPG. That's very low for a 228, but his drive was 100% city driving with the A/C on most of the time (we live in the Los Angeles area where we get many hot days). Occasionally I would drive the 228 for a day or two and the milage would jump up to around 30 since I would drive 75% highway, 25% city....and I know how to maintain speed while being light on the gas pedal.....my son hasn't learned how to do that yet.

That said, the reason for my original question was that I assumed the EPA testing would be the same exact method/cycle every year (even if the manufacturers are doing the testing themselves as discussed in the article above)...so that's why I asked whether there were other factors between the 2017 to 2020 model years (changes in the engine, software, drivetrain, etc.).
Appreciate 0
      04-27-2020, 04:03 PM   #9
Winemaker2
Second Lieutenant
United_States
62
Rep
204
Posts

Drives: 2017 230i MSport THP Dinan V2
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: SF East Bay, CA

iTrader: (0)

I tuned my car so city is a disgrace but hwy holds up:

City 19-20 if I don't push it, Hwy 32, and Combined 25.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.




2addicts
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST