|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Procede 4/23 Agressive Maps
|
|
06-20-2012, 01:33 PM | #1 |
Private
2
Rep 65
Posts |
Procede 4/23 Agressive Maps
Can someone please clear this up for me. Are the maps:
Map 0 is stock boost Map 1 is aggressive Map 2 is Meth map with more boost and timing advance Map 3 is naturally aspired Map 4 is meth with fail safe which runs map 1 until meth target is reached then switches to map 2. or Map 0-Valet Map 1-performance Map 2-high performance Map 3-NA (turbos shut off) Thanks! |
06-20-2012, 01:43 PM | #3 |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
OP-- Check your email. I think i emailed you a few minutes before you posted this
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 01:46 PM | #4 |
Private
2
Rep 65
Posts |
Got it Shiv, thanks, for those wondering here was Shiv's answer: yes, just run map1 or map2 (they will be the same unless you adjust one to be different than the other). Map0 is stock, map3 is NA (no turbo) and map4 will be unaccessible to you until you install PWM meth
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 01:50 PM | #5 | |
Captain
78
Rep 887
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 02:11 PM | #6 | |
Private
2
Rep 65
Posts |
Quote:
Maybe I just actually added some value to this forum |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 02:13 PM | #7 |
Banned
33
Rep 1,029
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 02:14 PM | #9 |
Captain
78
Rep 887
Posts |
I've heard couple different things and was always recommended to run Map 1 because Map 2 was the meth map without a failsafe and should never really be ran.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 02:16 PM | #10 |
Private
2
Rep 65
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 02:23 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant Colonel
29
Rep 1,551
Posts |
I think OTS the user adjustable for boost is the same, is what was implied there. Map 2 contains advanced ignition though, and should be used with meth in Map 4. Theres no real need to ever run map 2 unless you're using a different gas or something that merits its own dedicated map.
For most users on this form, Map 2 switches from Map 1 only when you're in Map 4, and it detects a specified Meth DC. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 02:42 PM | #13 | |
Captain
78
Rep 887
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 04:52 PM | #14 |
1737
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
With the default settings, map1 and map2 are exactly the same in every way (boost, fuel, timing, etc ). You can see this reflected in their user adjustable settings with are the same. Those running methanol are instructed to make map2 settings more aggressive (raises boost % and reduce ignition correction %. So with the default settings, driving on either map1 or map2 will result in the exact same performance.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-20-2012, 08:05 PM | #15 |
Major General
125
Rep 8,745
Posts |
Historically, folks would set Map 1 more conservative (lower boost) than Map 2. This way they could drive around mostly on Map 1, and switch to Map 2 on the fly when needed.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2012, 09:46 AM | #16 | |
Captain
78
Rep 887
Posts |
Quote:
was switching between Map 1 and Map 2 the other day just to see if they did feel the same and I swear the butt dyno always said Map 2 would pull harder... upon inspecting the two maps in the interface, the Ignition Advance Tables look different. I'm not completely sure but shouldn't Map 2 which looks to be more aggressive timing curve be faster than map 1 even though boost is the same? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2012, 11:21 AM | #17 |
Lieutenant Colonel
29
Rep 1,551
Posts |
Ignition correction transitionals have different logic with the agressive maps. For the map 2 Ign Correction value, old style used to be 100% = map1 values, 0% stock values. Now its 100% = map 1 values, 0% = map2 values.
Any percent inbetween is the linear difference between the two maps, applied to the more conservative map. Similar to boost targeting. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2012, 11:51 AM | #18 | |
Captain
78
Rep 887
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|