|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
PCV solution?
|
|
06-02-2013, 01:02 PM | #1 |
Banned
41
Rep 1,257
Posts |
PCV solution?
Just did a search and didn't find anything definitive. I remember the old thread, and was a part of it under a different username, but nothing ever came of it.
So, did anyone ever come up with a solid OCC, Venturi in DP, etc solution for eliminating the PCV ports in the intake manifold while retaining vacuum readings that fall within factory spec? |
06-02-2013, 01:39 PM | #3 |
Major General
194
Rep 6,136
Posts |
As far as I know, nobody has actually gone foward with setting up a DP venturi for the PCV. The ideal solution would be to have the check valve hooked up to a venturi bung in the downpipe, the rear turbo inlet pipe's PCV connection capped off, fully catless exhaust, and RB's upgraded valve so boost pressure is kept out of the crank, and you have a strong vacuum source full time.
I don't reccomend an oil catch can to anybody for this car, because the little vacuum that's there is extremely weak when you connect any OCC to it, and will cause issues. Either leave the stock check valve and hose system the way it is, or hook it up to a venturi bung in the downpipe IMO. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2013, 02:05 PM | #4 |
Banned
41
Rep 1,257
Posts |
OCCs being bad for this car isn't entirely true. The AR and BSH were able to flow within BMW's specs according to DZENNO with a set of RB's.
I guess what I am really wondering is, why can't we use 2 OCCs? One for positive pressure PCVs and one for the vacuum pulling PCVs. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2013, 02:35 PM | #5 | |
Major General
194
Rep 6,136
Posts |
Quote:
Because the PCV valve is integrated into the valve cover, you can't connect an OCC to it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2013, 06:23 PM | #7 | |
Banned
41
Rep 1,257
Posts |
Quote:
What we need is a full diagram of the stock PCV system labeled with the pressures/vacuum in each section. I haven't found it all yet, but would be grateful if someone who has the info still could drop it in here. We need more of the "This is how it could work" and less of the "This is why it won't work." Anything suggested should not be refuted without an idea to take it's place IMO. Gotta drive things forward, not stagnate them. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-02-2013, 06:24 PM | #8 |
Banned
41
Rep 1,257
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-03-2013, 06:52 AM | #9 |
Major
34
Rep 1,381
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-03-2013, 09:06 AM | #10 |
Banned
41
Rep 1,257
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|