05-25-2016, 02:00 PM | #2 |
What goes here?
453
Rep 1,356
Posts
Drives: 2019 G30 M550i
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Florida Space Coast
iTrader: (4)
Garage List 2019 BMW M550i [0.00]
2021 BMW M3 Competi ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M5 Competi ... [0.00] 2016 BMW M3 [0.00] 2014 BMW M235i [0.00] |
__________________
2019 G30 M550i
GBNF: 2021 G80 M3, 2019 F90 M5 Competition, 2016 F80 M3, 2014 F22 M235i |
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 02:08 PM | #3 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
8250
Rep 18,839
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Yes, we've dynoed a few, they're making impressive numbers. I'll have some dynojet numbers up shortly.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
Appreciate
1
|
05-25-2016, 02:28 PM | #4 |
LXO
191
Rep 166
Posts |
I dont know how to tag a forum user, but "The D.A." have a thread with dyno results: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...5&postcount=49
tom @ eas: Is it the same dyno as in this run: http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho....php?t=1003735 Standard M4 (421whp & 410wtq) compared to ZCP M4 (440-450whp & 440-451wtq) |
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 03:05 PM | #6 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
8250
Rep 18,839
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Quote:
2016 M4 ZCP, baseline And comparison of M4 vs M4ZCP: Comparison of M4 vs M4 ZCP - baseline Hope these help.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
|
Appreciate
2
|
05-25-2016, 03:29 PM | #8 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
8250
Rep 18,839
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
These are tested on our in-house dynojet, all numbers are at wheels.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 03:59 PM | #9 |
Barge driver
8658
Rep 12,425
Posts |
Wow! So both the standard and CP car are making almost the BMW quoted crank power at the wheels? (if I'm reading them correctly)
__________________
730d/Z4C
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 04:45 PM | #10 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
8250
Rep 18,839
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Appears that way. BMW seems to be going this direction since the F10 M5 numbers were first released.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
Appreciate
1
|
05-25-2016, 04:47 PM | #11 |
gone baby gone
382
Rep 1,052
Posts |
Caution on how you read and interpret those. STD correction factors were applied, so if those runs were done on a day hotter than the standard, they'll be artificially inflated. If they were done on different days with different conditions the delta between them will not be constant either. The proper way to measure the car is without any correction factor applied.
SAE j1349 correction: 29.23 in/hg. 77 degree temp 0 percent humidity Standard (STD) correction: 29.92 in/hg. 68 degree temp 0 percent humidity
__________________
///M3: MW / SO
|
Appreciate
2
|
05-25-2016, 05:43 PM | #12 |
Lieutenant Colonel
696
Rep 1,517
Posts |
I wonder if the JB4 would make that much more power on a ZCP car?, or probably not I'm assuming. It's the same parts probably just a pound or two of boost?
Not discrediting anyone but I'm not sure anyone can feel 20HP |
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 05:49 PM | #13 | |
Colonel
2634
Rep 2,809
Posts |
Quote:
The 2016 S55 ZCP and non-ZCP are basically the same engine. One is factory-tuned with a little more boost than the other. BMW might have been holding back a little power in valve overlap and might have revised cam angles a little to gain some more power, but other than that the end-result of tuning for max power will be about the same. Same exact potential. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 06:00 PM | #14 |
Brigadier General
2693
Rep 3,416
Posts |
And only after 5500 RPM, per BMW. Peak boost remains unchanged but tapers off slightly less approaching redline. But that's according to BMW's shitty charts they released which don't mean much anyway.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 06:30 PM | #15 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
696
Rep 1,517
Posts |
Quote:
Cool, thanks! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 06:35 PM | #16 |
Joint Chiefs of Staff
4920
Rep 115,999
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 06:42 PM | #17 |
Brigadier General
503
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Soon as I'm over 1200 miles, I'll be in to dyno Tom.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
Appreciate
1
|
05-25-2016, 06:55 PM | #18 |
Colonel
2634
Rep 2,809
Posts |
I wouldn't put much stock in BMW's "dyno charts". Initial dynos show gains throughout the powerband. I'm waiting to see more graphs as well as my own baseline, to know for sure. Also, I'll be able to datalog my ZCP soon; that alone should tell me a lot.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 07:04 PM | #19 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
8250
Rep 18,839
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Quote:
Here's an example on a 2008 E90 M3, 80K on the odometer. Car came in to be supercharged and received a pre-dyno and found it to be a bit on the low side than other M3s, barely cracking over 300whp. With the scanner, the M3 was found to have very old 100E software loaded(circa 2008, never updated since driveoff). A quick software update to 231E found a ~20whp gain shortly thereafter - nothing else changed, still strapped to the dyno. Partial gains can possibly be contributed to clearing of adaptations, but still shows BMW leaves power on the table on early releases just to be on the safe side. Some exciting things coming down the pipeline soon.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
|
Appreciate
1
|
05-25-2016, 08:22 PM | #20 |
gone baby gone
382
Rep 1,052
Posts |
If you can get a winpep8 runfile you could share, I'd be happy to overlay it with my non-zcp 100% stock baseline so we can get some idea of a comparison.
__________________
///M3: MW / SO
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 09:10 PM | #21 |
Colonel
2634
Rep 2,809
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-25-2016, 09:49 PM | #22 |
gone baby gone
382
Rep 1,052
Posts |
Correct, 2016 F80, 7/15 production pre-zcp. I have 3 runfiles stock just after 1200 mile service.
__________________
///M3: MW / SO
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|