Ebay M3 what do you think?

[sy2767]

http://www.ebay.ca/itm/ws/eBayISAPI....E:B:SS:CA:1123

Looks like a good deal, too much red interior though...

[mdefalco25]

Agree with the too much red, but looks to be priced right for miles/options. Looks clean as well. Are you able to see it in person?

[sy2767]

No...... I am in central Canada under 10+ feet of snow...LOL. Good price though, would like to check it out if i could. Back bumper between the exhaust tips looks to be deformed.. from heat i guess

[And1M3]

If you don't like the red you can easy swap it out with another member here. People will kill to swap their black for red interior.

[highmodulus]

can see some mods already- would be curious if the car had been driven hard/tracked, then dumped out of warranty.

[sy2767]

Originally Posted by highmodulus

can see some mods already- would be curious if the car had been driven hard/tracked, then dumped out of warranty.

I was thinking the exact thing! Other than the obvious exhaust what other mods do you see? Jumper cables in the truck is not good thing to see...LOL

[mdosu]

wait, ONLY $33k for a 50k M3, I didn't read all the details, what's the catch? That car is worth at least $36k.

[mdosu]

btw, the FR looks really bad on a SSII car. Specifically, it looked like he just cleaned it in that pic, b/c Novillo leather is not suppose to shine like that. Novillo has a dull finish.

Even BMW themselves did not recommend that color combo in their 2010 order brochure. That means the original owner had to go out of his way to order the FR for that car. But I'm sure there's alot of other E90 owners looking for a FR swap.


EDIT: it looks more and more like Coral Red, a non-M3 interior. You should ask about this. If there's an M3 logo in the headrest, then it's FR, else it's Coral red, which looks even worse than FR.

[1MOREMOD]

Originally Posted by mdosu

wait, ONLY $33k for a 50k M3, I didn't read all the details, what's the catch? That car is worth at least $37k.

that seems about right at 33-35 to me?

[sy2767]

Originally Posted by 1MOREMOD

that seems about right at 33-35 to me?

I was thinking the same, I've seen similar cars on this site sell for more $$. I could not live with that interior everyday, the extended leather in red seems very tacky to me. I only posted the EBay link because it seems like a decent deal for someone in the market, not the car for me. The headrests have the M logo and the seats looks to have been soaked in an armor all type product...some people like that, again, not for me.

[soniczoom5]

i saw red and almost threw up

[Kong Sheng Han]

It would look SO much better if the seats weren't red.

[Endless619]

Looks ok. The red seats have to go but everything else looks good IMO. Probably ditch/trash the shiftknob. That is so 1990's. BLah..

[MRSSIIM3]

interior looks really greasy

[nasa60]

Probably just the photography. It is one of the original launch vehicles. Mine is configured just like it and was built in January 2008 too. I can tell you the Fox Red extended leather looks great with Silverstone II. Maybe they rubbed Armor All all over it. Even the plastic door panels are shiney.